• Ann Arbor
    Ann Arbor
    201 S. Division Street
    Suite 400
    Ann Arbor, MI 48104
    T 734-761-3780
  • Cheboygan
    Cheboygan
    229 Court Street
    P.O. Box 405
    Cheboygan, MI 49721
    T 231-627-8000
  • Detroit
    Detroit
    1901 St. Antoine Street
    6th Floor at Ford Field
    Detroit, MI 48226
    T 313-259-7777
  • Grand Rapids
    Grand Rapids
    250 Monroe Avenue NW
    Suite 400
    Grand Rapids, MI 49503
    T 616-205-4330
  • Troy
    Troy
    201 W. Big Beaver Road
    Suite 500
    Troy, MI 48084
    T 248-743-6000
Go to page >
Go to page >
competitive drive
 

News Center

in the know
 

WORKPLACE LAW LOWDOWN | BREAKING NEWS: Federal Court Rules DOL'S 2016 Overtime Rule is Invalid

By: Bodman PLC

09/01/17

By now, you probably have heard that yesterday, August 31, 2017, the federal district court in Texas, which in November 2016 enjoined enforcement of the 2016 overtime rule, has decided that the rule’s minimum salary of $913 per week is invalid.

There are 3 factors to consider in determining whether an employee is exempt:

  1. a salary basis test – an exempt employee must be paid a guaranteed minimum salary every week;
  2. a minimum salary level test – an exempt employee must be paid at or above the designated minimum salary; and
  3. a duties test – an exempt employee must perform designated executive, administrative or professional duties.

The court ruled the 2016 minimum salary level exceeded the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) authority to make rules for determining which employees qualify for exemption from overtime pay. The 2016 minimum salary of $913 per week was so high it “effectively eliminated” the duties test because a lot of employees who, despite performing exempt executive, administrative or professional duties, would no longer qualify for exemption. The court concluded the DOL’s 2016 overtime rule is “invalid.” This means the current rule with the minimum salary level test of $455 per week remains in effect indefinitely.

Also yesterday (August 31, 2017), the state plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion in the court of appeals to halt further proceedings in the DOL’s appeal of the lower court’s injunction “pending further discussions by the parties.” In other words, the DOL and the businesses and states who filed the original lawsuits are talking and may be able to settle their differences, especially in light of the lower court’s ruling that the $913 per week minimum salary level is invalid and the DOL’s announced plan, which it has already commenced, to revisit the appropriate minimum salary level for exemption from overtime pay.

For further information on these proceedings or updates on the overtime rule contact a member of our Workplace Law Group.